How much Spider-Man is too much Spider-Man? This was likely on the minds of many when Sony announced their second reboot of Marvel's A-lister in just three years, after the dumpster-fire, universe building disaster than was Marc Webb's The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (you'll always get a pass for 500 Days of Summer, Webb), and in the process decimating all of Sony's plans for two more sequels, a Sinister Six spin-off and an... Aunt May spy flick? This planned universe was definitely caught in a tangled web of a mess.

The silver lining out of that announcement was that their third(!) Spider-Man will be part of Marvel Studios/Disney's Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), with a young Tom Holland (The Impossible) cast in the role soon after. This culminated in a memorable yet well-received debut in 2016's Captain America: Civil War, as this new edition blended well with the long established Marvel characters right on the get-go. So, with the new Spider-Man: Homecoming following Holland off the heels of Civil War, is this third Spider-Man in 10 years more Sam Raimi's original trilogy or more Webb's Amazing series?

If you've never warmed to the MCU films over the past decade, chances are that Homecoming would do little to convince you otherwise, as it retains most of the pros and (few) pitfalls that is apparent in this billion dollar franchise. Marvel had always preferred to hire indie directors to direct their latest projects, and it's no different with the hiring of Jon Watts to write plus helm Homecoming, having just come off the $5 million-budgeted Cop Car starring Kevin Bacon. The end result is a film with all the makings of a Marvel Studios film, and this new series retains the aesthetics of the Marvel movies with little repercussions for our heroes, for better or for worse. Quips have always been Spider-Man's other superpower since his printed debut, and it's certainly a match made in heaven when combined with level of banter which are omnipresent in the MCU.

Speaking of which, the integration mythos of past MCU's films appear to fit Homecoming like a glove, providing a more complementary relation between the new film and previous entries, rather than just throwing in blatant references for the sake of continuity. Adrian Toomes's turn to crime is deeply rooted from the Chitauri invasion from 2012's Avengers, while his dastardly plans all stem from technology salvaged/stolen from past battles (an Ultron head makes a cameo too). Don't worry, it's not the Spider-Man & Iron Man adventure the trailer had us worried, as Robert Downey Jr. only appears in a glorified four-scenes cameo, for which most were shown in the various commercials. In fact, take out the Iron Man and Avengers angles and you'll still have a pretty solid Spider-Man movie on its own.

Onto the new dude in the suit, this new... new Spider-Man by Tom Holland is an absolute delight on-screen, and by far the best young version of Peter Parker. Don't get me wrong, but each rendition of Spidey thus far has brought something to the table. You could argue that Tobey Maguire is great as an "Adult Parker", while Andrew Garfield shines as a "Boyfriend Parker", but it'll be interesting to see whether Holland could snatch these (hastily thought of) accolades in future sequels.

The lack of an origin story, which is pretty unnecessary by now, meant that this rendition of the web crawler does not have the weight of a dead Uncle Ben or his parents on his shoulders, and for once we get a Peter Parker who's definitely enjoying his superhero life, and one that we actually see converse through his school life and his crime fighting duties. Thankfully, Holland's rendition comes off as uncertain, stubborn yet equally eager, energetic and enthusiastic, while Parker's personality seem to trade seamlessly between his alter-egos (you'll notice the mega bump in confidence when Maguire dons the suit in the original).

What really sets this new Parker apart from those before him are his interactions with practically everyone in this film, from his young Aunt May (Marisa Tomei) to Happy Hogan (Jon Favreau), and it is with his peers that serve as Homecoming's better moments. Parker's classmates are given a 2010-esque makeover, focusing more on diversity in not only ethnicity but also in personality, while straying pretty far from their comic book counterparts.

Parker's best friend Ned Leeds (Jacob Batalon) is his best friend as well as confidante to his secret identity, and has perhaps the funniest lines and scenes in Homecoming. The stereotypical meathead bully Flash Thompson now a cynical, compensating nerd played by The Grand Budapest Hotel's Tony Revolori, while Zendaya's Michelle is equally narcissistic as she is sarcastic. We don't see these classmates all too often outside of Ned, but given that Homecoming takes place during Parker's sophomore year, they'll likely is plenty of sequels to get reacquainted with these colourful characters.

Michael Keaton is a fine addition to the storied franchise. Much like Jeff Bridges in the original Iron Man, the seasoned actor brings plenty of gravitas and tension to a role that admittedly looks bloody silly in the comics, as the former Beetlejuice is now playing his third flight-based character after Batman and Birdman. One memorable scene at the end of the second act really showcases the veracity and terror that Keaton can bring to the screen. Even if he does become a one-off villain, he was certainly one of the more memorable, even if that bar is still *shockingly* low in the MCU's Hall of Baddies. While the Vulture does command a presence whenever he's on screen, it's still nowhere as storied or layered than the likes of Willem Dafoe or Alfred Molina preceding him.

Spidey's rogue gallery is also present, but are presented as more of a support unit for the Vulture than full blown super villains integral to the plot à la Spider-Man 3, played by the likes of  Bokeem Woodbine (Fargo), Logan Marshall-Green (Prometheus, also discount Tom Hardy), and Donald Glover (The Martian; Childish Gambino). Glover in particular steals the show in one confrontation with Spider-Man in an empty parking lot.

Spider-Man: Homecoming is a noteworthy entry into the Marvel Universe, but while it couldn't match the dizzying heights or scale of Raimi's Spider-Man 2, arguably the gold standard of Spider-Man flicks, Homecoming's emphasis on the 'FUN' side of being the web-crawler is an enjoyable romp, and the new set of heroes and villains rarely put a foot wrong. Tom Holland's Spider-Man is one for the ages, and one that's likely struck a web cord with audiences  to embrace in the long haul. For Sony, maybe third time really was the charm? Hell, there was one blatant Sony product placement in sight this time around, and that's already a 'Stark' improvement.

After Captain America: Civil War got Marvel Studios' Phase 3 slate of franchise films off to a flyer, matters now turn to another one of Marvel's classic comic characters Stephen Strange, whose last real-life portrayal coming all the way back in a 1978 television film! Scott Derrickson, known for his work in the horror film circuit, with Sinister & Deliver Us from Evil under his resume, is tasked with introducing Doctor Strange, with his mystical powers into the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), and while last year's Ant-Man benefited from its Avengers connection, can Doctor Strange pull a rabbit out of the hat with a new horizon for the franchise into the realm of magic?

Right from the get-go, Doctor Strange treads very closely to the usual origin story beats, and more particularly in tandem with the original Iron Man way back in 2008, with the film beginning with your egotistical protagonist (played by Benedict Cumberbatch) whose accident puts him on a path to help others with the assistance of irregular abilities. Sounds like someone took the Iron Man script and labelled a sticky note saying "ADD MAGIC!" (no discredit to the writers here).

Comic book movies are a dime a dozen these days, with one released pretty much every season in a year. Back in the early days (till this year anyway), these films' premises were simple yet effective: it was always the case of good guys vs the bad guys. This doesn't seem to be the case anymore, with the desire for more convoluted plots and an array of characters, fueled by the success of 2012's The Avengers, has prompted film studios to craft up fresh takes on these fabled comic characters, often resorting to their long list of comic iterations for a hint of inspiration.

We've already seen the first of these, Warner Bros' Batman v Superman serving up an overstuffed and frankly depressing take on their planned DC Comics Universe, with that film also failing to consolidate itself in terms of box office receipts after a lofty opening. Thus, a month later on, we now have our second seismic Hollywood face-off of 2016, pitting the Captain of America against the Man of Iron in Captain America: Civil War.

Directed by Antony and Joe Russo, the 13th Marvel Cinematic Universe entry aims to follow up on the events of 2014's The Winter Soldier (which the Russos' also directed) as well as last summer's Avengers: Age of Ultron, and like Dawn of Justice, both films tackle the nature of a superhero's responsibilities on civilian casualties amidst their display of strength in saving the world, resulting in a  divide of super-heroic proportions. All of these, whilst introducing a third Spiderman in less than a decade, seems like an almighty feat indeed, but did the Russo Brothers' second Marvel feature do a better 'clash of the superheroes' depiction than Zack Synder's DC offering?

With Ant-Man rolling out in pretty much around the world already (save for the usual suspects - China and Japan), thus ends another billion dollar era in the short history of Marvel Studios. Unlike Phase 1, the second phase in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) was tasked with not only expanding on the stories of our established heroes after the events of 2012's The Avengers, but at the same time introducing newer characters to the mix, these new entities deriving from more obscure source materials than the likes of Iron Man and Captain America.

As evidenced over the past three years, all films improved greatly over their respective installments, with two billion dollar-spinning entries (Iron Man 3 and Avengers: Age of Ultron), but the biggest surprise was 2014's Guardians of the Galaxy, which attained universal acclaim on its way to a $750 million worldwide gross.

On the flip side, criticism soon surfaced over the recycled storylines and forced connections for a wider universe, leading to some quarters to believe that Marvel are getting both lazy or lethargic, though the revenue on-hand speaks for itself entirely. With fan demand at a fever pitch after The Avengers, and with DC Comics' on universe building steam sooner rather than later, how does the six Phase 2 films released stack up against each other?

"WHAT IS THIS? A MOVIE FOR ANTS? THE FILM'S GOT TO BE AT LEAST... THREE TIMES BIGGER THAN THIS"

Zoolander reference aside, being the 12th effort from Marvel Studios' long running Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), Ant-Man is the first non-Marvel sequel since last year's massively popular Guardians of the Galaxy, and the first solo Marvel film since 2011's Captain America: The First Avenger. If people thought GOTG was a risky property to bring to the cinema screens, Ant-Man probably felt worse off, no less due to its obscure source material and being further compounded by its own production problems right before cameras started rolling.

Edgar Wright, a personal favourite director of mine with efforts such as Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz and Scott Pilgrim vs the World, had been working on an Ant-Man standalone film way before Jon Favreau's Iron Man came to fruition. However, with the Marvel franchise ever expanding by the 2010s, the need for connections with every subsequent Marvel film was in order, Ant-Man included. Friction between Wright and the higher-ups at Marvel eventually came to a boiling point which prompted the director to leave deep into pre-production (and most of the cast members confirmed already). 

Peyton Reed, whose directorial portfolio includes comedies such as The Break-Up and Yes Man, was quickly drafted in the director's seat, while script revisions were conducted by Adam McKay (another comedy director of Anchorman and The Other Guys) and even Paul Rudd himself. So, with its chief designer gone and the behind-the-scenes trouble, is Ant-Man destined to underwhelm under Wright's shadow, or is it more of a blessing in disguise and another feather in Marvel Studios' feather-filled cap?

"HOLD ON TO YOUR BUTTS" - Samuel L. Jackson, Jurassic Park

Jurassic World is hitting cineplexes this week, with a fully functional theme park (at last!) and a Star-Lord to give the franchise a new slick of paint. With that, it's a great opportunity to revisit the original trilogy released between 1993 to 2001, with varying shift in qualities across the three movies based on the late Michael Crichton's original novels. Moreover, the franchise possibly single-handedly galvanised the world's interest in dinosaurs and the world 65 million years ago. Not a bad feat to achieve.

The three films have common themes, with an island infested with prehistoric monsters created through impossible science. On the way, our protagonists will either be attacked by a gigantic T-Rex, or a pack of cheeky raptors. Those clever girls are definitely the star dinosaurs of the franchise. Yet, it's still managed to rake in loads of cash (the first film garnering a billion dollars after re-releases), and no dino movie has even come close to the critical acclaim garnered. 

2014's coming to a close, and the new year will usher in another batch of film offerings, which promises to be bigger than ever (they always say that). With every sequel released, there's bound to be a franchise reboot somewhere along the lines, while an original film may pop up from time to time if movie studios were nice enough. So, with so many films released in the next 12 months, which ones are the most sough after? 

My top 15 (with the top 10 after the jump):

Johnny Depp's been kinda in a ditch for the past couple of years, with a slew of under-performing starring vehicles such as Dark Shadows, The Lone Ranger and 2014's disappointing Transcendence. In January, he's donning yet another  odd-looking makeup in a comedy heist which looks like good fun, as suggested as the very hilarious trailer (Tom Jones' 'It's not Unusual' in the background). Supported by an ensemble cast which includes Gwyneth Paltrow, Ewan McGregor and Olivia Munn, this may be the smaller-budgeted movie to help rejuvenate Depp's career.

14) Ted 2

13) The Peanuts Movie / Snoopy & Charlie Brown

Nothing much is known about this, but the teaser trailers shown so far oozes cuteness, and seems true to the original comic strips by Charles Schulz. After many film adaptations of the Dr. Suess materials, the rebooting of several classic literature and cartoons continues with The Peanuts Movie and an animated Popeye film also on the way (also similarly gorgeous).

It's hard to imagine that the first Hunger Games film was released only three years ago, and by year's end we'll be getting the final installment of the "Why does Katniss Care for Peeta?" four part series. Mockingjay Part 1 suffered from the splitting of the final book by showcasing less action and hardly any plot at all, so it's hopeful that the boring predecessor only serves as a massive build-up to the rebellion and an exciting conclusion to the entertaining young adult adaptation.

The Fast & Furious franchise sure is a lucky franchise. After almost seeping into a direct-to-DVD livelihood with Tokyo Drift, the series has gone strength by strength, in terms of quality and box office returns as well.

The seventh installment (!) now introduces even more new characters in the form of Jason Statham as Owen Shaw's evil brother and veteran Kurt Russell in an unknown role, while the director's duty is taken over by fellow Malaysian-born director James Wan, whose credit include the Saw franchise and The Conjuring. This is also the first installment since the unfortunate death of Paul Walker, who couldn't complete his filming of the movie, and has since been replaced with his brothers and some complicated CGI mumbo jumbo.